Tonga_survey report draft_Haapai

1 Pages 1-10

▲back to top

1.1 Page 1

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 1
Survey Report Draft1
Ha’apai
Date: 13, 15 and 16 Aug 2002
Participants: Asipeli, Peter, Dee and Seiji
(Ministry of Fisheries @ Ha’apai: Sione Mailau, Taliauli Napa’a)
Prepared by: Seiji Nakaya
1. Objectives
(1) There are no data available on coral reef ecology of the Ha’apai group. We
conducted a survey to obtain baseline information on the coral reefs of the Ha’apai
area. We visited two of the 3 reefs that were once proposed by Ha’apai
Environment Conservation Committee to be MPAs based on suggestions from the
Ministry of Fisheries2,3.
(2) There are few, if any, people who are capable of conducting scientific survey on coral
reefs in Ha’apai. One of the objectives of the survey was to transfer basic skill of
coral reef survey and monitoring to the staff of the Ministry of Fisheries as well as to
a DoE-affiliated Peace Corps member based in Ha’apai.
(3) Start obtaining information for evaluating the accuracy of the data collected by the
spot check method and for standardization of this method.
2. Methods
Spot check method was used to survey Mu’i kuku (August 13), Kito/Kito si’i (August 15)
and Lua hoko (August 16). Reef Check method was used at Kito si’i Reef on August 15,
where two staff members of the Ministry of Fisheries participated.
For obtaining information for standardizing spot check method, the spot check data
were compared with other data set collected by using a different method. That was:
a) A 50m tape measure was laid at the depth contours of 10m and 3m, and
b) a series of underwater digital photographs of the reef surface were taken along
1 The trip consisted of underwater surveys, meeting of Ha’apai Conservation Committee,
and visits of sites for environmental issues. This report draft covers only underwater
surveys.
2 We have yet to obtain documents for this proposal.
3 This survey was not more than a preliminary reconnaissance survey. We have
learned, from our experiences of the management of MPAs established in the
Nuku’alofa area in 1979, that establishing new MPAs requires a long process of baseline
biological/physical and socio-economic studies and that public participation for decision
making for the MPAs is critical to expect the support of users and the community.

1.2 Page 2

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 2
entire length of the line (50m).
The coverage of types of substratum such as live hard corals and of soft corals was
calculated by the following procedures similar to the video transect method (English
1997):
1) Attach a piece of transparent sheet with randomly placed 5 dots to a PC monitor;
2) Display underwater photos one by one on the monitor;
3) Record the number of dots that are on each category of substratum such as live
hard corals, soft corals, rocks, etc. for each photo;
4) A series of photos along the 50m line was divided into 4 parts, for each of which
the coverage in per cent was calculated4;
5) Obtain average and standard error for each data sets (10m and 3m).
3. Results and discussions
(1) Spot check
Mu’i kuku Reef on the western coast of Lifuka Island near its northern tip showed low
coverage of live hard corals (<15%) consisting of high variety of colony types as well as a
moderate coverage of soft corals (<10%) (Appendix 1). The low coral coverage was
observed with no obvious threats such as sedimentation, recorded outbreaks of
Crown-of-thorns starfish or bleaching.
Kito and Kito si’i Reefs also showed low percentage of corals (at most 7.5%) with a
variety of coral types. At some sites of Kito some large colonies of massive Porites were
observed. An isolated island of Lua hoko also showed low coverage of corals (<5%) on
4 The line was divided into 4 parts to obtain variance for comparison, even though this
method is not statistically convincing due to interdependency of data among these parts.
Ideally, multiple numbers of shorter tapes should be placed randomly on the reef.

1.3 Page 3

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 3
its southern reefs (this was the only part of the reefs surrounding the island that we
were able to access due to rough seas).
Map of Hakau Mu’ikuku showing spot
check sites (scale: 1/72600)
Map of Kito Reef showing spot check
sites c-fand Reef Check site~
(scale: 1/72600)
c
~
d
d
c
f
e
Map of Luahoko Island showing
spot check sites c-e (scale:
1/72600)
ecd
It was found that the variation among observers within site was large. Therefore, it is
necessary to standardize data by using objectively collected data.
(2) Reef Check
For the Reef Check survey, we
selected a part of the reef on Kito si’i
where hard-bottom slope continues
to more than 10m deep. Live hard
coral cover was 19% ± 0.7SE and
16% ± 0.3SE, and soft coral
24%±1.2SE and 31% ± 1.0SE, at
10m deep and 3m deep, respectively.

1.4 Page 4

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 4
Few fish were recorded during the survey except butterflyfish. The record
spreadsheets are attached in Appendix 2.
Understanding situations including that there are not available data on ecology of
Ha’apai coral reefs, that there is no staff of DoE in Ha’apai, and that there are few, if
any, personnel capable to conduct reef surveys, it is essential for DoE to collaborate with
staffs from the Ministry of Fisheries, experts of AusAID who are undertaking a
community-based management project in Ha’apai and DoE DoE affiliated US Peace
Corps members.
(3) Digital photos
On Mu’i kuku Reef at the depth contours of 3 and 10m, the coverage of live hard corals,
dead hard corals, soft corals, rubble, rock, fleshy algae and sand were calculated as
below. It is noticed that coral cover at 10m deep contour was comparatively high (28%
±7.1SE).
Sample of underwater photos for calculation of coral coverage
Data obtained by using underwater photos.
Depth
10m Mean%
Live hard Dead hard Soft
corals
corals
corals
27.5
0.7 14.6
SE
7.1
0.7
2.5
3m
Mean%
10.0
0.3
4.3
SE
3.1
0.3
3.9
Rubble
0.0
0.0
10.3
2.7
Rock
56.4
8.5
75.3
5.1
Fleshy
algae
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
sand
0.7
0.7
0.0
0.0
Data obtained by using spot check method.
Diver Depth m Live hard corals% Dead hard corals % Soft corals%
sand
A
3-3
7.5 (range 5-10)
10
7.5
20
IB I2-5 I
15
10
1(<5)
0

1.5 Page 5

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 5
The results of photo analysis were compared with the data from Spot Check at the same
site. As the divers conducting spot check use only snorkel, the reef deeper than some
5m may be uncertain, depending on the visibility. Therefore, the data only from 3m
contour was compared. The coverage of live hard corals measured by digital photo
method and by spot check method were 10%±3.1SE and 7.5 - 15, respectively.
As noticed during the spot check surveys, the variation within treatment was too high
to make a statistically meaningful comparison of data among different sites or different
times. It is necessary to reduce variation within the data sets. For this, it may be
useful to consider stratification for sampling, reducing the number of parameters to be
measured and increase replicates. The variation of data may also affected by skill and
experience of surveyors and by reef conditions such as coral cover and topography. Use
of underwater video may also be useful to make underwater time short, to reduce effort
in the field and therefore to increase the number of replicates.

1.6 Page 6

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 6
Appendix 1. Results of Spot Check surveys in Ha’apai between August 13 and 16, 2002.
Largest
Domi
Type of
plate
nant
substratum Sedi Acropor
Site
LHC DHC Soft coral COT with no
ment a cm Dept
name No. Diver Date Time % % C% type No. corals
% (0-4) diamete h m Remarks
South
Mu'i kuku 1 Asipeli 02/08/13 1700 7.5 10 7.5 5
0 sand
20 0
3-3
19º46'13.7"
Mu'i kuku 1 Asipeli 02/08/13 1700 13 10 10 5
0
00
5-5
19º46'13.7"
Mu'i kuku 1 Peter 02/08/13 1700 15 10 1 5
0
00
60 2-5
19º46'13.7"
Mu'i kuku 2 Asipeli 02/08/13 1745 7.5 10 15 5
0
00
15 3-5
19º45'58.7"
Mu'i kuku 2 Seiji 02/08/13 1745 5 1 5 5
0
00
2-3
19º45'58.7"
Kito
1 Asipeli 02/08/15 945 1 5 5 5
0
00
5
19º50'04.4"
Kito
1 Seiji 02/08/15 945 1 1 5 5
0
00
20 0.5-4
19º50'04.4"
Kito
1 Dee 02/08/15 945 1 1 1 2
0 sand
10 0
4-6
19º50'04.4"
Kito
2 Asipeli 02/08/15 1015 7.5 1 5 4
0
00
5-5 massive Porites
19º50'10.5"
Kito
2 Seiji 02/08/15 1015 5 1 1 5
0 sand
10 0
20 5-6 massive Porites(>5m 19º50'10.5"
Kito
2 Dee 02/08/15 1015 5 1 5 5
0 sand
10 0
15 4- 6
Kito
2 Dee 02/08/15 1015 1 5 1 5
0 sand
50 0
10 1- 3
Kito
3 Asipeli 02/08/15 1050 1 5 1 5
0 sand, rubble 40 0
10 2-2
19º50'10.5"
19º50'10.5"
19º50'23.3"
Kito
3 Seiji 02/08/15 1050 1 1 1 5
0 sand, rubble 30 0
15 1-2
19º50'23.3"
Kito
3 Dee 02/08/15 1050 1 1 1 5
0 rubble
15 0
15 4-6
19º50'23.3"
Kito
4 Seiji 02/08/15 1145 1 1 1 5
0
0
20 5-6
19º50'27.5"
Lua hoko 1 Seiji 02/08/16 1545 1 1 1 5
0 sand
30 0
20 1-3
19º40'26.2
Lua hoko 1 Peter 02/08/16 1545 1 1 1 5
0 sand
30 0
20 1-3
19º40'26.2
Lua hoko 1 Dee 02/08/16 1545 1 1 1 5
0 samd
50
1-5
19º40'26.2
Lua hoko 2 Seiji 02/08/16 1605 5 1 1 5
0 sand, rubble 15 0
60 2-5 many Zoanthidae
Lua hoko 2 Dee 02/08/16 1605 1 5 2 5
0 sand
50
20 1-5
Lua hoko 3 Seiji 02/08/16 1640 1 1 1 5
0 sand
10 0
30 1-3
Lua hoko 3 Peter 02/08/16 1640 5 1 1 5
0 sand
10 0
20 3-5
Lua hoko 3 Dee 02/08/16 1640 1 1 1 5
0 sand
10 0
15 1-5
West
174º21'24.2"
174º21'24.2"
174º21'24.2"
174º21'07.9"
174º21'07.9"
174º25'03.6"
174º25'03.6"
174º25'03.6"
174º24'46.2"
174º24'46.2"
174º24'46.2"
174º24'46.2"
174º24'43.7"
174º24'43.7"
174º24'43.7"
174º25'19.2"
174º23'39.4"
174º23'39.4"
174º23'39.4"
Photo: 20020813Haapai, 20020815Haapai and 20020816Haapai

1.7 Page 7

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 7
Appendix 2.
Spread sheets for the results of Reef Check in Kito si’i Reef on 15 August 2002
Site name
Kito si'i (near Uoleva Island of Ha'apai Group)
Date
15-Aug-02
Time of day that work started
1300
Time of day that work ended
1730
Longitude of transect start point
19,50'16.2"S
Latitude of transect start point
174,25'16.9"W
From chart or by GPS? (If GPS,
indicate units)
chart_____
GPS__X WGS84
Orientation of transect
N-S___
NE-SW X E-W___
SE-NW___
Distance from shore
1300 m
Distance from nearest river
180 km (No river exists in this island group; a stream exists on a
River mouth width
<10m_X
11-50m__ 51-100m__ 101-500m__
Weather
sunny_X
cloudy__X raining__X
Air temperature
23 degrees C
Water temperature at surface
23_ degrees C
Water temperature at 3 m
23_ degrees C
Water temperature at 10 m
? degrees C
not able to measure
Distance to nearest population centre 7 km
Approximate population size
3x1000 people
Horizontal visibility in water
25 m
Why was this site selected?
Is this site -
sheltered_X
exposed_____
Any major coral damaging storms in
past years?
yes_____
no_____
unknown_X
How do you rate this site overall in
terms of anthropogenic impact?
none____
low____
moderate_X heavy____
What types of impacts do you believe
occur?
linefishing, spearfishing, shell collection
Dynamite fishing
none_X
low____
moderate____ heavy____
Poison fishing
none_X
low____
moderate____ heavy____
Aquarium fish collection
none_X
low____
moderate____ heavy____
Harvest of invertebrates for food
none____
low____
moderate_X heavy____
Harvest of invertebrates for curio sales none____
low_x
moderate____ heavy____
Tourist diving
none____
low_x
moderate____ heavy____
Sewage pollution
none_X
low____
moderate____ heavy____
Industrial pollution
none_X
low____
moderate____ heavy____
Other forms of fishing? (Specify)
none____
low____
moderate_x heavy____
Other impacts? (Specify)
none____
low____
moderate____ heavy____
Is there any form of protection (statutory
or other) at this site?
yes_____
no_x(once the fishery agency proposed this r
If yes, what type of protection?
Other comments
Submitted by (enter TL/TS and your name) TL: 'Asipeli Palaki; TS: Seiji Nakaya (submitted by S. Nakaya)

1.8 Page 8

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 8
Site name: Kito si'i
Depth:
10m
Team Leader: Asipeli Palaki
Time:
1600
Substrate Code
HC hard coral
FS fleshy seaweed
RB rubble
OT other
Date: #####
Data recorded by: Asipeli Palaki
SC soft coral
SP sponge
SD sand
RKC recently killed coral
RC rock
SI silt/clay
(For first segment, if start point is 0 m, last point is 19.5 m)
SEGMENT 1
SEGMENT 2
SEGMENT 3
0 - 19.5 m
25 - 44.5 m
50 - 69.5 m
1 RC 21 sc 41 sc 61 rc 81 rc 101 RC
2 FS 22 sc 42 rc 62 rc 82 rc 102 RC
3 SD 23 sc 43 rc 63 rc 83 rc 103 RC
4 RB 24 rc 44 sd 64 rc 84 rc 104 fs
5 RB 25 rc 45 sc 65 hc 85 sc 105 fs
6 SC 26 rc 46 hc 66 hc 86 hc 106 fs
7 HC 27 hc 47 rc 67 sc 87 hc 107 sc
8 SC 28 rb 48 sd 68 rc 88 rc 108 RC
9 HC 29 sc 49 rc 69 rc 89 rc 109 RC
10 SC 30 sc 50 sc 70 rc 90 rc 110 RC
11 SC 31 hc 51 sc 71 rc 91 hc 111 RC
12 RB 32 rc 52 rb 72 hc 92 rc 112 sc
13 HC 33 hc 53 rc 73 hc 93 rc 113 sc
14 rb 34 sc 54 rc 74 fs 94 hc 114 sc
15 hc 35 sc 55 rb 75 fs 95 sc 115 RC
16 hc 36 rc 56 rc 76 sc 96 sc 116 RC
17 sc 37 rc 57 hc 77 rc 97 sc 117 RC
18 rb 38 sd 58 sc 78 rc 98 hc 118 hc
19 rc 39 fs 59 sc 79 rc 99 rc 119 hc
20 sc 40 rb 60 rc 80 rc 100 rc 120 RC
SEGMENT 4
75 - 94.5 m
121 sc 141 rc
122 rc 142 rc
123 fs 143 rc
124 rc 144 rc
125 rc 145 hc
126 hc 146 sc
127 rc 147 rc
128 hc 148 sc
129 hc 149 sc
130 hc 150 hc
131 rc 151 sc
132 rc 152 rc
133 rc 153 rc
134 rc 154 rc
135 hc 155 rc
136 hc 156 sc
137 sc 157 sc
138 sc 158 hc
139 rc 159 rb
140 sd 160 sc
DO NOT TYPE DATA BELOW THIS LINE
Total S1 Total S2 Total S3 Total S4
HC 8 HC 6 HC 7 HC 9
SC 13 SC 8 SC 8 SC 10
RKC 0 RKC 0 RKC 0 RKC 0
FS 2 FS 2 FS 3 FS 1
SP 0 SP 0 SP 0 SP 0
RC 8 RC 20 RC 22 RC 18
RB 7 RB 2 RB 0 RB 1
SD 2 SD 2 SD 0 SD 1
SI 0
OT 0
SI 0
OT 0
SI 0
OT 0
SI 0
OT 0
# 40 # 40 # 40 # 40
Grand total
HC 30
SC 39
RKC 0
FS 8
SP 0
RC 68
RB 10
SD 5
SI 0
OT 0
Mean
SD
HC 7.5 HC 1.3
SC 9.8 SC 2.4
RKC 0 RKC 0
FS 2 FS 0.8
SP 0 SP 0
RC 17 RC 6.2
RB 2.5 RB 3.1
SD 1.3 SD 1
SI 0 SI 0
OT 0 OT 0
40
Comments:

1.9 Page 9

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 9
Site name: Kito si'i
Depth:
3m
Team Leader: Asipeli Palaki
Time:
1700
Substrate Code
HC hard coral
FS fleshy seaweed
RB rubble
OT other
Date: #####
Data recorded by: Taliauli Napa'a
SC soft coral
SP sponge
SD sand
RKC recently killed coral
RC rock
SI silt/clay
(For first segment, if start point is 0 m, last point is 19.5 m)
SEGMENT 1
SEGMENT 2
SEGMENT 3
0 - 19.5 m
25 - 44.5 m
50 - 69.5 m
1 rc 21 sc 41 rc 61 rc 81 hc 101 sc
2 hc 22 hc 42 rc 62 rc 82 rc 102 sc
3 rc 23 rc 43 rc 63 rc 83 rc 103 sc
4 sc 24 sc 44 sc 64 rc 84 rc 104 RC
5 sc 25 rc 45 sc 65 rc 85 rc 105 hc
6 sc 26 rc 46 sc 66 hc 86 rc 106 rc
7 hc 27 rc 47 rc 67 rc 87 rc 107 sc
8 rc 28 sc 48 hc 68 sp 88 hc 108 sc
9 sc 29 rc 49 rc 69 sd 89 hc 109 sc
10 rc 30 sc 50 rc 70 sd 90 hc 110 sc
11 rc 31 rc 51 rc 71 rc 91 rkc 111 rc
12 rc 32 sc 52 sc 72 hc 92 sc 112 rc
13 sc 33 rc 53 rc 73 sc 93 sc 113 rc
14 hc 34 sc 54 sc 74 sc 94 sc 114 rc
15 sc 35 rc 55 hc 75 sc 95 rc 115 rc
16 rc 36 sc 56 hc 76 rc 96 sc 116 sc
17 sc 37 hc 57 rkc 77 hc 97 sd 117 rc
18 rc 38 rc 58 sc 78 sc 98 sd 118 rc
19 sc 39 hc 59 sc 79 rc 99 sd 119 rc
20 hc 40 rc 60 sc 80 rc 100 rc 120 hc
SEGMENT 4
75 - 94.5 m
121 sc 141 sc
122 sc 142 hc
123 rc 143 hc
124 rc 144 hc
125 rc 145 rc
126 hc 146 hc
127 rc 147 sp
128 sc 148 rc
129 sc 149 rc
130 rc 150 hc
131 sc 151 sp
132 sc 152 rc
133 sc 153 rc
134 sc 154 sp
135 hc 155 sc
136 rc 156 rb
137 rc 157 rb
138 rc 158 rb
139 rc 159 rb
140 rc 160 rb
DO NOT TYPE DATA BELOW THIS LINE
Total S1 Total S2 Total S3 Total S4
HC 7 HC 6 HC 6 HC 7
SC 15 SC 12 SC 12 SC 10
RKC 0 RKC 1 RKC 1 RKC 0
FS 0 FS 0 FS 0 FS 0
SP 0 SP 1 SP 0 SP 3
RC 18 RC 18 RC 18 RC 15
RB 0 RB 0 RB 0 RB 5
SD 0 SD 2 SD 3 SD 0
SI 0 SI 0 SI 0 SI 0
OT 0 OT 0 OT 0 OT 0
# 40 # 40 # 40 # 40
Grand total
HC 26
SC 49
RKC 2
FS 0
SP 4
RC 69
RB 5
SD 5
SI 0
OT 0
Mean
HC 6.5
SC 12
RKC 0.5
FS 0
SP 1
RC 17
RB 1.3
SD 1.3
SI 0
OT 0
SD
HC 0.6
SC 2.1
RKC 0.6
FS 0
SP 1.4
RC 1.5
RB 2.5
SD 1.5
SI 0
OT 0

1.10 Page 10

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 10
REEF CHECK 2001- Please fill in all Black outlined boxes
Site Name:
Kito si'i
Depth:
10m
Date:
######
Team Leader:
Time:
Asipeli Palaki
1400
Red Sea Belt Transect : Fish
Data recorded by:
Butterfly fish
Sweetlips (Haemulidae)
Snapper (Lutjanidae)
Broomtail wrasse (Cheilinus lunulatus)
Peter Cloutier
0-20m 25-45m 50-70m 75-100m Total Mean SD
1
0
2
3 6 1.5 1.29
0
0
0
00
00
0
0
1
1 2 0.5 0.58
0
0
0
00
00
Grouper >30cm (Give sizes in comments)
0
0
0
00
00
Bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon
muricatum)
0
0
0
00
00
Humphead wrasse (Cheilinus undulatus)
0
0
0
00
00
Any Parrotfish (>20cm)
0
0
2
1 3 0.75 0.96
Moray eel
0
0
0
00
00
Red Sea Belt Transect : Invertebrates
Data recorded by:
Seiji Nakaya
0-20m 25-45m 50-70m 75-100m Total Mean SD
Banded coral shrimp (Stenopus hispidus)
0
0
0
00
00
Diadema urchins
0
0
0
00
00
Pencil urchin (Heterocentrotus
mammilatus)
0
0
0
00
00
Sea cucumber (edible only)
0
1
0
0 1 0.25 0.5
Crown-of-thorns star (Acanthaster)
0
0
0
00
00
Giant clam (Tridacna)
1
0
0
0 1 0.25 0.5
Triton shell (Charonia tritonis)
0
0
0
00
00
Lobster
0
0
0
00
00
For each segment, rate the following as: None=0, Low=1, Medium=2, High=3
Coral damage : Anchor
Coral damage:Dynamite
Coral damage : Other
Trash : Fish nets
Trash : Other
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Comments:
Grouper sizes (cm):
Bleaching (% of coral population):
Belaching (% per colony):
Suspected disease (type/%):
Rare animals sighted (type/#):
Other:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

2 Pages 11-20

▲back to top

2.1 Page 11

▲back to top
S. Nakaya, 2007-05-28, p. 11
REEF CHECK 2001- Please fill in all Black outlined boxes
Site Name:
Kito si'i
Depth:
3m
Date:
######
Team Leader:
Time:
Asipeli Palaki
1540
Red Sea Belt Transect : Fish
Data recorded by:
Butterfly fish
Sweetlips (Haemulidae)
Snapper (Lutjanidae)
Broomtail wrasse (Cheilinus lunulatus)
Seiji Nakaya
0-20m 25-45m 50-70m 75-100m Total Mean SD
0
1
0
34
1 1.41
0
0
0
00
00
0
0
0
00
00
0
0
0
00
00
Grouper >30cm (Give sizes in comments)
0
0
0
00
00
Bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon
muricatum)
0
0
0
00
00
Humphead wrasse (Cheilinus undulatus)
0
0
0
00
00
Any Parrotfish (>20cm)
0
1
0
0 1 0.25 0.5
Moray eel
0
0
0
00
00
Red Sea Belt Transect : Invertebrates
Data recorded by:
Taliauli Napa'a
0-20m 25-45m 50-70m 75-100m Total Mean SD
Banded coral shrimp (Stenopus hispidus)
0
0
0
00
00
Diadema urchins
0
0
0
00
00
Pencil urchin (Heterocentrotus
mammilatus)
0
0
0
00
00
Sea cucumber (edible only)
0
2
1
14
1 0.82
Crown-of-thorns star (Acanthaster)
0
0
1
0 1 0.25 0.5
Giant clam (Tridacna)
1
1
0
1 3 0.75 0.5
Triton shell (Charonia tritonis)
0
0
0
00
00
Lobster
0
0
0
00
00
For each segment, rate the following as: None=0, Low=1, Medium=2, High=3
Coral damage : Anchor
Coral damage:Dynamite
Coral damage : Other
Trash : Fish nets
Trash : Other
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
00
00
00
00
00
00
Comments:
Grouper sizes (cm):
Bleaching (% of coral population):
Belaching (% per colony):
Suspected disease (type/%):
Rare animals sighted (type/#):
Other:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0